To the Bernie Supporters


As many Bernie Sanders’ supporters have come to know, the election was rigged from the beginning against Bernie Sanders. Many of the young college age people who voted for him did not know about the super delegates nor the other factors that have come to light lately that ensured Hillary Clinton would win the Democratic nomination for president. There are other factors though that have not come to light through the media. I will discuss the one which was most significant here that ensured Hillary would get the nomination.

Voting fraud is rampant throughout this nation. It is especially bad with certain types of machines and those which are more than 10 years old.  I am an engineer and have a healthy background and education in statistical analysis. So, in this blog piece, I will be directing you to legitimate statistical analyses and cases of documented tampering with voting results.

I cannot do justification for the following piece, so I encourage you to go to the following site which gives the best analysis on the Internet I believe on the voter fraud which occurred during the Democrat primaries this year. http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/16/clinton-does-best-where-voting-machines-flunk-hacking-tests-hillary-clinton-vs-bernie-sanders-election-fraud-allegations/

For those of you not interested in going to this site, it can be summed up by saying, where voting machines in particular precincts in America are located which do not have adequate security to prevent voter fraud, Hillary Clinton consistently benefited in the fraud.

There is an abundance of analysis done in this piece including what is known as the Alabama test. In Alabama as discussed in this aforementioned blog piece, only a small number of counties use machines that flunk security tests for fraudulent manipulation which includes its largest counties. The other counties use hand cast ballots. This provides a good microcosm to look for voter fraud when using these machines as compared to the other counties in the state. When examining all the highest populated counties, only those three using the old Model 100 voting machine gave Hillary 80% of the vote. Madison County which is one of the four most populous counties in Alabama gave a result of a 38.5% spread between the Hillary and Bernie vote. This county used the newer model DS200 voting machine. The other three large counties, Jefferson, Mobile, and Montgomery gave a spread in Hillary’s favor of 64.2%, 66.5% and 73.4%. These types of spreads far exceed the probabilities that such an event would occur in only those counties that used the older more hackable machines.

“The Political Insider” has reported the electronic Diebold voting machine in Maryland has been seen changing Republican votes to Democrat votes. When a person selects a Republican, when the vote is cast the votes continuously were changed to a Democrat candidate. Many people had to change it back 4 or 5 times before the vote would not alter to the Democrat candidate. ( http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/confirmed-experts-voting-machines-maryland-illinois-rigged-support-democrats/)

Something like this can happen because electronic voting machines are only as good as the person who programs them when it comes to security. One corrupt programmer can get those machines to select any particular candidate the programmer wants the machine to select.

The following is a statistical analysis of the results of the 18 Democratic Primary states which had their primaries held between March 1 and April 19 of this year.

It explains how a statistical analysis is done and tries to help you understand things like what is meant by a 95% confidence level.

For those of you who do not want to watch the short video, basically it tells us that out of 18 contests, 8 exceeded the margin of error for what the exit polls told us would be the result. These exit polls were done at a 95% confidence level which means out of 18 states, we could expect at best only one to exceed the margin of error. Instead we had 8 exceed the margin of error. The analysis given shows that there is only a 5 out of a billion chances that 8 out of 18 states would have the vote count difference between Hillary and Bernie exceed the margin of error predicted by the exit polls. There is a greater chance you would be struck by lightning or win the 400 plus million dollar lottery we have today than having the voting margins in 8 out of these 18 contests exceed the margin of error for the exit polls.

However, the analysis in video stops there and goes no further. There is another point to bring up. Out of these 8 states, statistically you would expect Bernie Sanders to have 4 of these states favor him when exceeding the margin of error in the exit polls. That is we can expect Bernie’s expected percentage of votes to increase while Hillary’s decreases in 4 of these 8 states. It did not happen, though. In all 8 cases, Hillary’s vote increased over expected percentages. The probability of that happening is one-half multiplied by itself 7 times (i.e. 0.5 raised to the 8th power) or a 4 out of a thousand chances. This calculation is included in the calculation result of a five in a billion chance mentioned earlier since we were considering the range of votes (2.5%) that favored Hillary which exceeded the margin of error. As a result of this analysis, anyone who is a Bernie Sanders’ voter, you know you were cheated by a corrupt system.

I do expect that if there is an election in November which I do not expect to occur, you can be sure that voter fraud will occur with our voting machines. Voter fraud is more difficult to carry out in presidential elections, but you can expect a lot of votes given to the Green Party will be switched to Hillary instead. I mention that because many Bernie supporters are expected to vote for the Green Party candidate this year. We need to be informed about all the fraud that is going on in this country, and voter fraud in the Democrat camp is never and will never be addressed by a complicit media that supports Hillary Clinton.

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: